| Home | About Us | About Homeopathy | Getting Treatment | How We Can Help You | What You Can Do | Research | Media Centre |
Regulated practitioners
Members of the Faculty of Homeopathy are doctors and other healthcare professionals who are regulated by their professional body (for example, the GMC for doctors). Read more on regulation.
Safety and cost benefit
Safety
A review of the safety of homeopathy, conducted by doctors associated with the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital (RLHH) studied papers published between 1970 and 1995 for reports of adverse effects of homeopathy.
Adverse effects reported in clinical trials were temporary aggravations of symptoms or other mild and transient effects (mostly headaches, tiredness, skin eruptions, dizziness or diarrhoea).
Only a very few isolated reports of proper adverse effects were attributable to homeopathic medicines.1 The authors of the review concluded: "Homeopathic medicines in high dilutions, prescribed by trained professionals, are probably safe and unlikely to provoke serious adverse reactions".
One of the expressed reasons for the popularity of homeopathy among patients at the RLHH is that it does not have the side effects associated with many conventional drugs.2
Cost benefit
The available evidence suggests that homeopathy has the potential to generate savings through reduced conventional prescribing and demand for other services.3 Full-scale economic evaluation has not taken place, however, largely because of the huge resources that would be involved to do so.
Nevertheless, studies have shown that the purchase costs of orthodox drugs and procedures fell after the introduction of homeopathy.4,5,6
Moreover, a comparative study has suggested that homeopathic management of children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections was more cost-effective than conventional care.7
Another study concluded that homeopathy might be able to reduce the need for antibiotics in children with acute otitis media.8
References:
1. Dantas F, Rampes H. Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review. Br Homeopath J 2000; 89: S35–8.
2. Sharples F, van Haselen R. Patients’ perspectives on using a complementary medicine approach to their health. A survey at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital NHS Trust. London, 1998.
3. Smallwood, C. The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the NHS, FreshMinds. October, 2005
4. Swayne J. The cost and effectiveness of homoeopathy. Br Homeopath J 1992; 81: 148–50.
5. Feldhaus HW. Cost-effectiveness of homoeopathic treatment in a dental practice. Br Homeopath J 1993; 82: 22–8.
6. Frenkel M, Hermoni D. Effects of homeopathic intervention on medication consumption in atopic and allergic disorders. Altern Ther Health Med 2002; 8: 76-9.
7. Chaufferin G, et al. Medicoeconomic assessment of treatment of recurrent acute rhinopharyngitis in 18-month-old to 4-year-old children by general practitioners. Proceedings Journées de l’Institut Boiron
2002: 87-8.
8. Frei H, Thurneysen A. Homeopathy in acute otitis media in children: treatment effect or spontaneous resolution? Br Homeopath J 2001;
90: 180-2.